Page 1 of 1

Plaque vs. Conversation

Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2018 11:01 am
by amkamarainen
Hi All,

Can anyone explain their rationale/justification for using plaques instead of conversations?

It seems that everything one might want to do with a plaque, you could also do with a conversation.

For example, the manual says "An interesting feature of plaques is that they can modify the player when viewed, giving or taking items and attributes." - but I believe you can also do this within a conversation...

If you were trying to explain to a new ARIS designer in which situations they should use a plaque instead of using a conversation, what would you say?

Thanks for filling in anything I might be missing!

Re: Plaque vs. Conversation

Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2018 9:44 am
by chrish
Good question! For me, plaques are very simple to imagine and edit. If I have no need for decision making or other complex interactions I use plaques. There are also differences in the screen layout. Plaques have their image or media at the top and then any text below. Conversations try to fill the screen with the image and later the text over the lower portion, like a portrait and dialog sitting atop. There are other small differences but that’s the major ones.

Re: Plaque vs. Conversation

Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 6:23 pm
by chrish
Here's a blog post I wrote, giving some general information adn advice about plaques vs. conversations, and how to use plaques as the foundation of learning adn using ARIS. Thanks for the inspiration!